🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an event that started out as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is celebrated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A campaign to remove African American heritage and narrative from the records is ongoing. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the month represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and alertness to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.